Essay: To Kill A Mockingbird
In "To Kill a Mockingbird", how does Scout and Calprunia's relationship change during Scout's relationship with Calpurnia matures, too, when she sees first- hand how 2 educator answers; What are 3 quotes from the book that show racial. "It's right hard to say," she said. "Suppose you and Scout talked colored-folks' talk at home it'd be out of place, wouldn't it? Now what if I talked white-folks' talk at. Even though this seems like a negative relationship and seems as if though it can never get better, the relationship between Scout and Calpurnia changes.
Calpurnia is a very important character in the novel. Scout never liked Calpurnia very much, mostly because she always complained about her behaviour. Their battles were epic and one-sided.
Calpurina always won, mainly because Atticus always took her side. At that time, she was too young to realize that Calpurnia only tried to help her and teach her so she would be literate and know more useful things.
Even though this seems like a negative relationship and seems as if though it can never get better, the relationship between Scout and Calpurnia changes through the novel. As Scout grows and becomes more mature, she realizes that Calpurnia is nice and that she always means good when Scout thinks the opposite. Calpurnia said that she had missed Scout that day while she and Jem were at school.
All of a sudden, Calpurnia was really nice to Scout. She let Scout watch her fix supper, she made crackling bread for her, and she even kissed her.
Scout describes how she feels after all this behaviour: She had wanted to make up wth me, that was it. She had always been too hard on me, she had at last seen the error of her fractious ways, she was sorry and too stubborn to say so. Scout is deeply hurt when Calpurnia tells her that picking on Walter Cunningham while he eats at their place is rude and that Scout should stop that and never do it again. Here, Scout thinks that Calpurnia is being mean to her again, but when she grows up a little, she will be thankful to Calpurnia because she taught her about being polite and respectful to her guests.
Essay: To Kill A Mockingbird
The novel's centerpiece is the trial of Tom Robinson, a black man accused and eventually convicted of a crime he didn't commit: He's nobly defended by Scout's father, crusading lawyer Atticus Finch. During Robinson's testimony, it's also implied that Mayella's father has been sexually abusing her.
A similar trial merits a brief mention in Watchman. Here, though, the person Atticus defends is an unnamed "colored boy," the alleged victim is an unnamed year-old white girl, and, most importantly, the case ends in an acquittal, because "Atticus could and did prove consent. It doesn't seem like a stretch to assume that Lee eventually combined Francine and Watchman's alleged rape victim to make a single character, Mayella.
But while both novels feature a character called Atticus Finch, the version of Scout's father that we meet in Watchman hardly resembles Mockingbird's upright role model.
That Atticus railed against the racist judicial system in his native Alabama, citing Tom Robinson's innate humanity and declaring that all people, regardless of race or class, should be equal in the eyes of the court.
Even if you're prepared, though, it's devastating to watch a grown-up Jean Louise discover that her father's been reading a eugenics pamphlet that "makes Dr. Goebbels look like a naive little country boy," or that he's attending meetings led by a man "who had quit his job to devote his full time to the preservation of segregation," or that he considers African-Americans a "backward people" who have not earned the privilege of citizenship.
Are they different characters who share the same name, a first-draft version and a final-draft version? Could Mockingbird's Atticus simply be the result of the same evolution that changed a nameless year-old into Mayella and Tom's acquittal into a guilty verdict? Or is there actually some continuity between these apparently divergent versions of Jean Louise's father — the hero and the racist?
That's the thorny question at the center of Watchman, which really picks up as a novel only when Jean Louise starts to feel betrayed and disillusioned by her beloved father — and it may hold the key to understanding how Lee's two published works relate to one another.
Harper Lee on March 14, Idealists can harden into reactionaries as they age, especially in an environment as conservative as Lee's fictional setting, Maycomb, Ala. Given the discrepancy between the Robinson trial as described in Watchman and the Robinson trial as described in Mockingbird, though, the thread connecting both Atticuses might be even more complicated.
In Watchman, after Jean Louise eavesdrops on the council meeting that exposes the depths of Atticus's racist views, she becomes physically ill. She can't understand how the man she's always admired as a paragon of decency can believe such abhorrent things.
Quotes by on Prezi
She can't even stand to hear her father call her by her childhood nickname anymore. It has to be[,] because all these people cannot have changed.
And that's when the nostalgia begins: Why did I come back here? Just to rub it in, I suppose.
Just to look at the gravel in the back yard where the trees were, where the carhouse was, and wonder if it was all a dream. Jem parked his fishing car over there, we dug earthworms by the back fence Jean Louise worries "that she must spend the rest of her years reaching out with yearning" for her past, "making secret trips to long ago.
Before her brother, Jem, suddenly dropped dead of a hereditary heart condition, and before Dill Harris, "the friend of her heart," took off for Europe and never came back. A time, in other words, that sounds a whole lot like To Kill a Mockingbird. Perhaps the thorny, uncomfortable universe of Watchman is Jean Louise's "real" universe — and Mockingbird is a nostalgic fantasy, a novel that the character herself wrote in order to fix the things about her reality that she thought needed fixing.
This theory isn't meant to downplay Mockingbird's merits. Lee's first published work is a classic for a reason, the sort of book that practically demands periodic rereads. But lyrical, poignant, and surprisingly funny as Mockingbird may be, the book does present a relatively simplistic moral universe.