What Does 'Reaffirmation of Accreditation' Mean? As you know, West Virginia State University (WVSU) is in the process of an extensive institutional resources, student learning, institutional effectiveness and relationships with internal and. Some of the standards in the Principles of Accreditation have been During the reaffirmation of accreditation process and in all other relationships with the. Eighteen months prior to the accredited program's cycle expiration date, GAC sends a Letter of Request for Intent to Renew GAC Accreditation to the accredited .
Reaffirmation Cycle Reaffirmation shall occur not more than ten years from the date of the last formal Commission action reaffirming accreditation; for an institution that received initial accreditation after its most recent comprehensive evaluation, reaffirmation shall occur not more than four years after the initial accreditation action.
Should the reaffirmation action take place in the spring or fall following the required date for reaffirmation, such action shall be considered to have met the requirements of this policy provided that the evaluation visit takes place no later than ten, or, where applicable, four, years from the date of the last reaffirmation action.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation 2015
The cycle for reaffirmation may be less than ten years for institutions that participate in or are assigned by the Commission to processes that require more frequent reaffirmation. An institution may file a formal request for an extension of its reaffirmation process, provided that it has a compelling reason for seeking such extension and it is not under sanction or show-cause with, or pending withdrawal by, the Commission or any other recognized accrediting agency. The maximum cycle permitted under this policy is eleven 11 years.
Procedural Requirements for Reaffirmation Prior to every formal Commission action reaffirming the accreditation of an institution that institution and the Commission shall have participated in a process that includes the following components: Processes for Reaffirmation Each accredited institution in good standing with the Commission shall reaffirm and maintain its accredited status by participating in evaluation processes that: These evaluation processes shall be known as accreditation pathways.
The Commission may approve other pathways. Each pathway shall include a series of evaluative activities that the Commission determines to be appropriate for that pathway provided that each pathway allows an institution to fulfill the procedural requirements necessary to maintain accreditation. In any pathway the Commission staff may seek external assistance from peer reviewers or individuals with appropriate expertise who do not participate as peer reviewers in the evaluation process but provide particularized advice and assistance where appropriate to Commission staff or evaluation team members.
Institutions not yet accredited by the Commission as well as accredited institutions that are on probation, under show-cause, or pending withdrawal action shall participate in evaluation activities specifically outlined in Commission policy applicable to such designation and shall not participate in a pathway.
Requirements for Reaffirmation (INST.C) | Policies
How often must an institution seek reaffirmation of its accreditation? An accredited institution like Rollins seeks reaffirmation of accreditation every 10 years by undertaking a detailed self-study of its practices and submitting a required Compliance Certification Report CCR demonstrating its adherence to regional standards.
How many requirements, standards, and regulations are there? SACSCOC currently asks accredited institutions to write narratives that assure institutional compliance with about standards.
While some of these do not apply to Rollins e. Core, Comprehensive, and Federal. Give an example of a standard. The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that 1 incorporate a systematic review of institutional mission, goals, and outcomes; 2 result in continuing improvement in institutional quality; and 3 demonstrate the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.
The institution's use of technology enhances student learning and is appropriate for meeting the objectives of its programs. Students have access to and training in the use of technology. The institution evaluates success with respect to student achievement consistent with its mission.
Criteria may include enrollment data; retention, graduation, course completion, and job placement rates; state licensing examinations; student portfolios; or other means of demonstrating achievement of goals. Reffirmation of accreditation sounds pretty demanding. Completing the CCR required the collaboration of the entire campus.
In addition, each claim that Rollins made in the CCR had to be backed up by documentation, in much the same way that a scholarly article would footnote its sources.