Judas Iscariot - Wikipedia
), because Jesus then turned to Simon and said to him in loving to Simon Peter were significantly different from what He said to Judas. Carefully examining the Passion of Christ, Simon Peter and Judas Iscariot . and mend the brokenness in our human relationships is present. Judas Iscariot, one of Jesus' twelve apostles, betrayed his master to the . of his disciples-the one whom Jesus loved-was reclining next to him; Simon Peter.
Simon’s Son Judas
Mark's Gospel states that the chief priests were looking for a way to arrest Jesus. They decided not to do so during the feast [of the Passover ], since they were afraid that people would riot;  instead, they chose the night before the feast to arrest him. According to Luke's account, Satan entered Judas at this time. The evangelist comments in John Ehrman argues that Judas's betrayal "is about as historically certain as anything else in the tradition",   pointing out that the betrayal is independently attested in the Gospel of Mark, in the Gospel of John, and in the Book of Acts.
Meier sums up the historical consensus, stating, "We only know two basic facts about [Judas]: Afterwards, he committed suicide by hanging himself.
Lewisfor example, to reject the view "that every statement in Scripture must be historical truth". Zwiep states that "neither story was meant to be read in light of the other"  and that "the integrity of both stories as complete narratives in themselves is seriously disrespected when the two separate stories are being conflated into a third, harmonized version.
Reed argues that the Matthew account is a midrashic exposition that allows the author to present the event as a fulfillment of prophetic passages from the Old Testament. They argue that the author adds imaginative details such as the thirty pieces of silver, and the fact that Judas hangs himself, to an earlier tradition about Judas's death. Jeremiah 18—9 concerns a potter Illumination from a western manuscript, c. There are several explanations as to why Judas betrayed Jesus.
The Gospel of John account has Judas complaining that money has been spent on expensive perfumes to anoint Jesus which could have been spent on the poor, but adds that he was the keeper of the apostles' purse and used to steal from it. In this view, Judas is a disillusioned disciple betraying Jesus not so much because he loved money, but because he loved his country and thought Jesus had failed it.
Another is that regardless of the betrayal, Jesus was ultimately destined for crucifixion. Origen of Alexandriain his Commentary on John's Gospel, reflected on Judas's interactions with the other apostles and Jesus' confidence in him prior to his betrayal. They allege various problematic ideological contradictions with the discrepancy between Judas' actions and his eternal punishment.
Bruce Reichenbach argues that if Jesus foresees Judas' betrayal, then the betrayal is not an act of free will and therefore should not be punishable. Conversely, it is argued that just because the betrayal was foretold, it does not prevent Judas from exercising his own free will in this matter.
The difficulty inherent in the saying is its paradox: The earliest churches believed "as it is written of him" to be prophetic, fulfilling Scriptures such as that of the suffering servant in Isaiah and the righteous one in Psalm 22, which do not require betrayal at least by Judas as the means to the suffering. Regardless of any necessity, Judas is held responsible for his act Mark John Calvin states that Judas was predestined to damnation, but writes on the question of Judas' guilt: There is no 'Canon of the Damned', nor any official proclamation of the damnation of Judas.
It is speculated that Judas's damnation, which seems possible from the Gospels' text, may not stem from his betrayal of Christ, but from the despair which caused him to subsequently commit suicide. Schonfield suggested that the crucifixion of Christ was a conscious re-enactment of Biblical prophecy and that Judas acted with the full knowledge and consent of Jesus in "betraying" him to the authorities.
The book has been variously described as 'factually groundless',  based on 'little data' and 'wild suppositions',  'disturbing' and 'tawdry'. Irenaeus records the beliefs of one Gnostic sect, the Cainiteswho believed that Judas was an instrument of the SophiaDivine Wisdom, thus earning the hatred of the Demiurge.
His betrayal of Jesus thus was a victory over the materialist world.
The Cainites later split into two groups, disagreeing over the ultimate significance of Jesus in their cosmology. However, it adds many of its own tales, probably from local legends, including one of Judas.
In this pseudepigraphic work tells how Judas, as a boy, was possessed by Satanwho caused him to bite himself or anyone else present. In one of these attacks, Judas bit the young Jesus in the side; and, by touching Him, Satan was exorcised.
Peter and Judas
It further states that the side which Judas supposedly bit was the same side that was pierced by the Holy Lance at the Crucifixion . Gospel of Judas[ edit ] Main article: It appeared to be a 3rd- or 4th-century-AD copy of a 2nd-century original,   relating a series of conversations in which Jesus and Judas interact and discuss the nature of the universe from a Gnostic viewpoint.English - Judas Betrays Jesus; Jesus is Arrested
The discovery was given dramatic international exposure in April when the US National Geographic magazine published a feature article entitled "The Gospel of Judas" with images of the fragile codex and analytical commentary by relevant experts and interested observers but not a comprehensive translation. The article's introduction stated: DeConick raises about translation choices are addressed in footnotes in both the popular and critical editions.
She concluded that the ongoing clash between scriptural fundamentalism and attempts at revision were childish because of the unreliability of the sources. Therefore, she argued, "People interpret, and cheat. The answer is not to fix the Bible but to fix ourselves. Islamic view of Jesus' death According to medieval copies the earliest copies from the 15th century of the Gospel of Barnabas it was Judas, not Jesus, who was crucified on the cross.
However, some of the smartest people I have known have made terrible choices. Two persons in the New Testament made some bad decisions. Judas Iscariot and Simon Peter were disciples of Jesus. These two men followed Jesus along with ten other men for three years, and bad choices marked their journey.
Last Supper Thoughts: The True Difference Between Peter and Judas
For thirty pieces of silver, he would take them to a garden, walk up to Jesus, kiss him on the cheek and he would be arrested and taken to court. After this event took place, Judas saw his terrible mistake. Some scholars believe that Judas was expecting Jesus to flex his muscles and take over the territory as ruler and king.
There were those willing to fight for Jesus. Judas knew he had made a mistake.
Judas Iscariot and Simon Peter and Their Mistakes
After the conviction of Jesus, Judas attempted to correct his mistake by taking the money back. Those who arrested Christ would not negotiate. Judas realized his action as a big mistake. The Bible story says that Judas found a rope, a tree and hung himself. Matthew 26 and 27 There are many opinions about Judas, and there are many interpretations of what kind of man he was. One thing is sure; Judas knew he had made a mistake.
He had made such a misjudgment, which in his opinion, there was no way to correct it. Therefore, Judas felt that taking his life was the only way out.