When someone refers to the "give and take" in a relationship, to be a give and take, you will both give up some things and both gain some things. While give and take is never totally equal, you should do your best as a. The same is true for relationships where a balance of give and take is a sound . always do the 'right thing', but if nobody knows then you gain only satisfaction. An introduction between two people may not take much time out of your day, seem meaningful to What does it cost to build a relationship?.
Via establishing symbiotic interactions with other organisms, completely new possibilities arise. What is the success story of this type of organismic interaction?
Can we extract the main points of the success of symbiosis?
Give and take – the success of natural symbiosis - Blogionik
I will try to pin down three aspects, which I consider the most central ones do you disagree or have other suggestions? Specialization focus on several effective features instead of trying to do it all The willingness to provide something in order to gain something as a reward The ability of co-evolution — being able to develop further and optimize the mutual cooperation with the goal to achieve a more efficient interaction What could we learn from natural symbiosis in a biomimetic context?
Are we able to implement or at least learn from these aspects for ameliorating interactions we have to deal with? For example industrial supply chains where partners are highly dependent on each other or other kinds of cooperation, division of labour expertise or simply working groups?
To realize this concept, some conditions have to be considered such as geographic proximity of the partners  or the cooperation of at least three entities as well as the exchange of at least two different resources .
Can this be called a biomimetic approach? Can a complex system from biology, such as a symbiotic relationship, be really implemented in an industrial environment?
Is it maybe too difficult or requires too many abstraction steps? An exact balance is not always required as trust acts to make this a 'sloppy' system.
The greater the trust, the more negative the balance can become before concern about repayment arises. If I trust you then I will give a lot before I seek to take in return, confident that you will repay me at some time in the future. In each relationship there is a bucket system of 'social capital' where we make deposits and withdrawals from the bucket.
The exact currency is difficult to define but could perhaps be approximated with the formula emotion x time. If you spend two hours helping someone, and they spend an hour helping you, then, if the emotional exchange is equal, they still owe you an hour. Emotional complexity The problem in balancing the books of social exchange is that emotion is a complex variable. If you help me for an hour and I am very grateful, then I may feel a need to help you for three hours doing something in return.
Gratitude is hence a powerful driving emotion in social exchange. When I help you, it is your gratitude that is the deposit in my account that motivates you to repay me, not just the fact that I helped you. Other emotions complicate the situation. For example if I help you and expect you to be grateful, then my feelings of expectation will give me the impression that I have earned a certain amount of social capital, and that my bucket is a little fuller as yours is a little emptier.
Yet if you are not that grateful, you will not think you owe me that much.
Give and Take
In fact if you did not need or want my help then you may think you owe me nothing. And if you see my help as an intrusion or an attempted 'robbery' in forcing me to owe you in return then your feelings of resentment will tip the balance the other way as you believe I owe you some reparation for the wrong done. In this way positive and negative emotions have opposite effects on the social capital bucket, and the stronger the emotion, the bigger the effect.
If you hurt me in any way, then you owe me. If you help me then I owe you. Love and hate are enduring emotions that have a big effect on give and take. If I love you then I will give much.
Even if you do little in return, I will feel good for having helped you and hence effectively reward myself with good feelings rather than expect things from you. The extreme form of this is unconditional love which, as the name suggests, expects nothing in return.
Love can also complicate the bucket when it leads to lower expected reciprocity. My expressions of love for you may make you feel that I expect little.
This can cause resentment and anger that results in recriminations that erode the love, effectively 'killing the golden goose'. Hate is often based in the belief that the other person owes a great deal, which justifies attacks that take much from them.
When others refuse to repay what we believe they owe us then our emotions become negative and hence motivate harmful action. Just as unconditional love does not consider what is given, blind hate is not concerned with what is taken. Both can upset the bucket and confuse the social capital account, though each is likely to beget itself.
Love very largely creates love and hate mostly creates hate. Love results in much reciprocal giving while hate leads to battles of blow-by-blow taking. The wider effect While give and take is important in individual relationships, its broader power is in the creation of society. As relationships deepen and trust increases, we may take from one person and give to another.
For example a person in a happy relationship will be kind to others, effectively sharing the social capital gained from their relationship partner. This is helped by the fact that emotional exchange is often unconscious.
When I help you, I may not realize the value I provide and so do not expect much in return. This gives you the scope to help others without emptying the bucket. The overspill thus created keeps society afloat in a sea of social capital.
Social capital can be gained indirectly when others see you helping people and doing good things. When they appreciate your actions in conforming with social norms, their approval effectively acts as putting a few social credits into your bucket.