Colin Powell Endorses Barack Obama on Meet the Press - video dailymotion
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell announced Sunday that he will be voting for Sen. Barack Powell makes announcement on "Meet the Press" Sunday Video Watch what Powell says about Obama». "He has met the. Colin Powell on Obama's “Muslim” faith point in a memorable interview on NBC's Meet the Press, prior to the presidential election in Alexander Street's Meet the Press database will assemble more than Television's first live satellite interview, with British Prime Minister Harold Colin Powell's endorsement of Barack Obama for president, which pulled in a.
Colin Powell endorses Obama
Few Americans do such things and when they do they are subject to the rightful condemnation of their fellow citizens. They may be destroying a piece of cloth, but they do no damage to our system of freedom which tolerates such desecration. If they are destroying a flag that belongs to someone else, that's a prosecutable crime.
If it is a flag they own, I really don't want to amend the Constitution to prosecute someone for foolishly desecrating their own property. We should condemn them and pity them instead. I understand how strongly so many of my fellow veterans and citizens feel about the flag and I understand the powerful sentiment in state legislatures for such an amendment.
I feel the same sense of outrage. But I step back from amending the Constitution to relieve that outrage. The First Amendment exists to insure that freedom of speech and expression applies not just to that with which we agree or disagree, but also that which we find outrageous. I would not amend that great shield of democracy to hammer a few miscreants. The flag will be flying proudly long after they have slunk away.
Finally, I shudder to think of the legal morass we will create trying to implement the body of law that will emerge from such an amendment. If I were a member of Congress, I would not vote for the proposed amendment and would fully understand and respect the views of those who would.
For or against, we all love our flag with equal devotion. He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. So in effect, our policies have strengthened the security of the neighbors of Iraq. What the hell, what are these guys thinking about? The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order.
Also see Woodware, Bob We have sent men and women from the armed forces of the United States to other parts of the world throughout the past century to put down oppression.
We were willing to do it, glad to do it. We went to Korea. We went to Vietnam. All in the interest of preserving the rights of people. And when all those conflicts were over, what did we do?
Did we stay and conquer? Did we say, "Okay, we defeated Germany. Now Germany belongs to us? We defeated Japan, so Japan belongs to us"? What did we do? We built them up. We gave them democratic systems which they have embraced totally to their soul. And did we ask for any land? No, the only land we ever asked for was enough land to bury our dead.
Meet The Press Archives Available For The First Time On Streaming Video | Alexander Street
Capital is a coward. It flees from corruption and bad policies, conflict and unpredictability. It shuns ignorance, disease and illiteracy. As quoted by Ambassador Cameron R. Hume in a speech on U. My heart grieves when I think about the situation in the Middle East. I've worked very hard on this for two years, and for years before that.
But trust is broken down. We have to do everything we can in our power — all of us, the United States, the European Union, any other nation that has the ability to influence the situation in the Middle East — to work with the Palestinians to put in place a leadership that is responsible, with representative institutions of government that will clamp down on terrorism, that will say to its people, "Terrorism is not getting us anywhere.
It is not producing what we want: It is keeping us away from a Palestinian state. There is nothing in American experience or in American political life or in our culture that suggests we want to use hard power. But what we have found over the decades is that unless you do have hard power — and here I think you're referring to military power — then sometimes you are faced with situations that you can't deal with.
I mean, it was not soft power that freed Europe. It was hard power. And what followed immediately after hard power? Did the United States ask for dominion over a single nation in Europe? Soft power came in the Marshall Plan.
Soft power came with American GIs who put their weapons down once the war was over and helped all those nations rebuild. We did the same thing in Japan. So our record of living our values and letting our values be an inspiration to others I think is clear.
And I don't think I have anything to be ashamed of or apologize for with respect to what America has done for the world. We have gone forth from our shores repeatedly over the last hundred years and we've done this as recently as the last year in Afghanistan and put wonderful young men and women at risk, many of whom have lost their lives, and we have asked for nothing except enough ground to bury them in, and otherwise we have returned home to seek our own, you know, to seek our own lives in peace, to live our own lives in peace.
But there comes a time when soft power or talking with evil will not work where, unfortunately, hard power is the only thing that works. Response to a question by George Carey a former Archbishop of Canterburyafter the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland 26 Januaryas to whether the US had given due consideration to the use of "soft power" vs "hard power" against the regime of Saddam Hussein ; this has sometimes been portrayed as an accusation by an Archbishop of Canterbury that the United States was engaged in "empire building", in which Powell's response has been paraphrased: Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders.
The only amount of land we have ever asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return. Remarks to the United Nations Security Council 5 February ; in an interview September with Barbara WaltersPowell was asked about the Security Council speech and responded that it was a "blot" on his record… "it will always be a part of my record. It is the result of preparation, hard work and learning from failure.
But I think this goes too far, and I think it has made the McCain campaign look a little narrow. It's not what the American people are looking for. He's always been a Christian," he said. Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country?
The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president?
Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, 'He's a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists. Following the interview, Powell told reporters outside NBC's Washington studio that McCain "is essentially going to execute the Republican agenda, the orthodoxy of the Republican agenda with a new face and a maverick approach to it, and he'd be quite good at it, but I think we need more than that. I think we need a generational change. I think Senator Obama has captured the feelings of the young people of America and is reaching out in a more diverse, inclusive way across our society.
Colin Powell: Iran deal a 'pretty good deal' | MSNBC
And this business of, for example a congresswoman from Minnesota going around saying let's examine all congressmen to see who is pro America or not pro America, we have got to stop this kind of non-sense and pull ourselves together and remember that our great strength is in our unity and diversity.
That really was driving me. We can't judge our people and hold our elections on that kind of basis. Yes, that kind of negativity troubled me. And the constant shifting of the argument, I was troubled a couple of weeks ago when in the middle of the crisis the campaign said 'we're going to go negative,' and they announced it. Obama is now a socialist, because he dares to suggest that maybe we ought to look at the tax structure that we have.
Taxes are always a redistribution of money. Most of the taxes that are redistributed go back to those who pay them, in roads and airports and hospitals and schools.
And taxes are necessary for the common good.