Vintage Beatles Albums -What Are They Worth? | HubPages
Ebay's new required statement • Import duties, taxes $, High: $ Great price and value when compared to PicClick similar items. Meet The Beatles Lp Record,on Capitol,t Mono, Great Condition!! $ Buy It Now 19d. GO TO OUR "MEET THE BEATLES" BACKGROUND INFO PAGE FOR COMPLETE DESCRIPTIONS. CAPITOL T MONO THE VERY FIRST VERSION OF CAPITOL RECORDS' "MEET THE BEATLES" ALBUM RELEASED IN VERY. Offered in Catawiki's The Beatles auction: Beatles - LP Meet The Beatles (Capitol T It was the first US Beatles album to be issued by Capitol Records on
The newer and better condition its in the higher price it will bring.
- Beatles VINTAGE 64 U.S. MONO ' MEET THE BEATLES ' LP FACTORY SEALED! EC PRESS
- BEATLES: MEET THE BEATLES *MEGA-RARE NO ASCAP/NO BMI PUB CREDITS* CAPITOL T-2047
- Valid bid!
Even a little damage or dirt can bring the price down. If the record has been played a lot you may just want to keep it and play it yourself. The White Album which came out in is the most popular and most sought after album. An unopened mint condition copy of the album will bring twelve hundred dollars or more. Abbey Road which was the Beatles last studio released album is one of the most sought after albums and in mint condition it sells for as high as four hundred dollars.
There are still a lot of great Beatles records and albums still out there to be found. You can pretty much go by the better condition they are in the higher price they will bring. If you plan to sell the record or album and it has never been opened then leave it that way. In mint condition they will bring the higher price. Be sure to do careful research and keep a journal with carefully detailed notes. If you have a collection of Beatles Albums or Beatles records then first of all you need to sort your albums and records into fair, goodand mint condition.
Then you need a real good guide like Perry Cox's "The Official Price Guide to The Beatles Records and Memorabilia," This guide provides the best guide to the condition of the records and albums and the price they should sell for. The Beatles were around for only 10 years but during that time they recorded records and albums under various labels.
Keep in mind that promotional copies of 45's are rarer still. You need to learn the labels You may know what the Capital and Apple labels may look like but the Beatles appeared on a variety of labels under many different colors.
Some are of course more rare than others.
Now its time for a reality check. Records were made to be played and if a record was played a lot its price is going to be low.
Beatles discography: United States of America (USA)
The record may not have any sale value at all if it has been played heavily. If its been played heavily it may have a place in your collection but no one else is going to want to pay a lot of money for it. You need to be honest with yourself when your going through your records and albums and deciding what condition they are in. But if you have a Beatles record or album in mint or nearly perfect condition you just may be able to get a few hundred to a few thousand dollars for it.
Do good research and make sure what you have is really what you think it is. If your going to sell it on E Bay your going to have to be real sure. If you have questions, comments, or suggestions about Beatles records or albums please post them below. What Are They Worth? I remember the night they performed on the Ed Sullivan show. It was the 9th of February and I thought it was one of the wildest and best things I ever saw.
Even way back then 73 million viewers in 23 million households watched the Beatles. It was for many years the most watched TV show in history. The next morning the Beatles woke up to negative criticism on the TV and Radio.
Most people were claiming that the Beatles would ruin the youth of America. A day later though Beatlemania would erupt. Their first American concert was held at Washington Colosseum and it was a huge success. Below is a video of that song. This time in front of an audience of 70 million. They then flew back to England on the 22 of February. I have a lot of their early albums from the early days and they really will bring what you can get people to pay. If you have a Beatles Album or even a collection of them you should first of all check out the condition of the album and the LP or record inside.
The better the condition the more it will bring. Everything needs to be perfect if it is going to bring the higher price. There are unfortunately a lot of fake Beatles signatures out there. I have seen many albums the owners claim were signed by the Beatles when they were not.
Do not buy a signed album until it has been verified authentic by an expert. Be sure to check out everything offered as proof with the album. And this included the top 5 positions. In August of the Beetles returned to America and did thirty concerts in 23 cities.
It created intense interest in the Beatles. Their concerts were only thirty minutes long and between 10 and 20 thousand fans attended each concert.
It was in August of that year that the Beatles meet Bod Dylan and he introduced them to marijuana. Dylan made a strong impression on Lennon and before the year was out Lennon was imitating some of Dylan's style and Dylan's nasal drone. And then in earlywhile they were his guests for dinner Harrison and Lennon's dentist slipped LSD into their coffee.
Lennon later described the experience as terrifying but fantastic. He said he was stunned for a month or two. It is guaranteed original and perfect in every way. There are some of these albums that sell for into the low thousands.
Four months later, Capitol put yet another album on the market by repackaging the Beatles' first album -- one which they had originally turned down -- as "The Early Beatles".
It still had three fewer songs than the original LP. It was business as usual for Capitol when the Beatles produced their fourth LP in late"Beatles For Sale" given the circumstances, an album title Capitol should have retained.
Identify "Meet the Beatles" Capitol vinyl | Steve Hoffman Music Forums
Instead, Capitol's offering for the Christmas season was the misnamed "Beatles '65" album, which was really eight of the fourteen "Beatles For Sale" tracks, with both sides of the Beatles' latest single thrown in for good measure. Six months later, Capitol combined the remaining six "Beatles For Sale" tracks with three non-film songs from the "Help! At this point, the Beatles themselves could no longer keep track of which songs had appeared on what albums in America.
A tape of the Beatles' August performance in Houston reveals John Lennon trying to introduce the song "Dizzy Miss Lizzy" by naming the album on which it appears: The Capitol Records version of "Rubber Soul" was not the same as the UK version, however, as four tracks were deleted from British LP in order to withhold the more commercial songs as potential singlesand replaced with two leftover songs from the "Help!
Since the full force of Beatlemania had hit America in earlyCapitol Records, thanks to their continual rearrangement of Beatles LPs, had never gone as long as four months without releasing some sort of new Beatles album. In earlytherefore, Capitol had a problem on their hands: Their last release had been the previous December's "Rubber Soul" album, but since the Beatles were now putting more time and deliberation into their studio work, another LP wouldn't be ready until at least late summer.
Capitol Records therefore faced the prospect of going a whole eight months with no new Beatles product to release, more than twice their longest previous dry spell. Capitol did have six tracks withheld from the last two Beatles albums, along with both sides of the Beatles' previous single, in the can, but eight songs weren't sufficient to comprise a whole album, even by Capitol's meager standards.
It was then that Capitol took the action that was supposed to have finally enraged the Beatles to the point of protest: They gutted the Beatles' as yet unfinished "Revolver" album by rushing three of the completed tracks to America to fill out the album they released as "Yesterday and Today" on June 15, As producer George Martin later elaborated, "Rubber Soul" had been "the first album to present a new, growing Beatles to the world.
For the first time we began to think of albums as art on their own, as complete entities. In the years that followed, the rumor was born that the original "Yesterday and Today" butcher cover was a protest against the album itself, made by a group weary of seeing LPs conceptualized as integrated works of art cut up at the whim of an American record company.
The truth was quite different, however. Circumstantial evidence alone tends to indicate that the Beatles did not plan the butcher cover as a protest over the "Yesterday and Today" album. The photo session that produced the cover shot took place on March 25, As Capitol did not yet have a sufficient number of tracks on hand for a new album at that time and the three songs eventually used to fill out the album were not recorded until a month laterit is doubtful that they had any definite release plans at that point.
Even if they did, it is extremely unlikely that the Beatles -- notoriously ignorant of business affairs, especially where EMI's American subsidiary was concerned -- were aware of them. If the Beatles had truly intended the photo as a protest, there would be little point to their diluting its impact by using it elsewhere, much less employing it to promote one of their own UK single releases!
And, if the Beatles were genuinely upset with the way Capitol Records was handling their music, why didn't they simply speak up about it as they already had about the Vietnam War, religion, and other controversial topics?
Even when the original "Yesterday and Today" album was recalled and re-released with a new cover, the Beatles said scarcely a word about it. There were no indignant howls of protest from the Beatles, no railing against Capitol Records and their policies. John said only that the cover was "as relevant as Vietnam", and Paul merely added that it was "very tasty meat".
Identify "Meet the Beatles" Capitol vinyl
Much more than circumstantial evidence exists in this case, however. The notion that the butcher cover was an original idea conceived by the Beatles -- John Lennon in particular -- has generally been taken for granted. Although the Beatles were certainly keen on the idea, and willing participants in the session that produced the bizarre photographs, the man who actually came up with concept behind the pictures was photographer Robert Whitaker.
Whitaker, who ran a photographic studio in Melbourne, Australia, accompanied a journalist friend to an interview with Beatles manager Brian Epstein during the the group's trip to Australia in June of Whitaker shot photos of Epstein during the interview; when Brian saw the resulting prints, he was so impressed with the young photographer's work that he asked Whitaker to come work for him.
Beatles VINTAGE 64 U.S. MONO ' MEET THE BEATLES ' LP FACTORY SEALED! EC PRESS | #
Whitaker accepted the job three months later, and he spent the next few years traveling with the Beatles and shooting them on their tours, in the recording studio, during private moments, and in arranged photo sessions. Robert Whitaker was responsible for the steamer trunk photo that replaced the butcher cover on the "Yesterday and Today" album, as well as the back cover of the "Revolver" album.
What, then, was the point behind the photograph? As Whitaker explains it, the idea for the photo session came about because they "were all really fed up at taking what one had hoped would be designer-friendly publicity pictures".
John Lennon, in an interview shortly before his death inechoed this sentiment: We were sick to death of it. As he later said, "I had toured quite a lot of the world with them by then, and I was continually amused by the public adulation of four people. The butcher photos, along with the other pictures from that session, can be seen in Whitaker's book "The Unseen Beatles" The photographs taken, and the reasons behind them, are explained as follows: The first photograph is of the Beatles, facing a woman with her back to the camera, hanging on to a string of sausages.
This picture was supposed to represent the 'birth' of the Beatles, with the sausages serving as an umbilical cord. An umbilical cord was one way of doing it. Whitaker explained that this picture was intended to demonstrate that the Beatles were not an illusion, not something to be worshipped, but people as real and substantial as "a piece of wood".
The center of the triptych and the only pose taken in color was to to have been the infamous butcher photo, showing the Beatles surrounded by slabs of red meat and dismembered dolls. This picture was actually titled "A Somnambulant Adventure", and its intent was to present a contrast, something shocking and completely out of line with the Beatles' public image. As Whitaker revealed, the picture used on the "Yesterday and Today" cover was a rough, unfinished version: Around the heads would have gone silver halos, jeweled.
A fourth picture, apparently not planned as part of the triptych Whitaker isn't clear about this, mentioning only three pictures in his interviewis also included in "The Unseen Beatles". It features John framing Ringo's head with a cardboard box, on one of the flaps of which is written "2,".
In this life he was just one of two million members of the human race. The idolization of fans reminded me of the story of the worship of the golden calf. How did that photo, featuring the Beatles among slabs of meat and decapitated dolls, come about? Was it your idea or the Beatles'? Why meat and dolls? There's been a lot of conjecture over the years about what that photo meant.
The most popular theory is that it was a protest by the Beatles against Capitol Records for supposedly "butchering" their records in the States. Rubbish, absolute nonsense Q: Were you aware when you shot it that Capitol Records was going to use it as an album cover? No That's all there is to it. The butcher photo was, as Whitaker says, "snatched away and eventually was pretty well taken out of context".
As happened so many other times where the Beatles were concerned, someone retroactively invented an explanation for something that was mere coincidence or happenstance, and to a public largely willing to believe almost anything about the Beatles, it became an accepted truth.
As usual, the reality was far different. We're more popular than Jesus now; I don't know which will go first, rock 'n' roll or Christianity. John Lennon "I should have said television was more popular than Jesus, then I might have got away with it It will vanish and shrink.
I needn't argue with that; I'm right and I will be proved right. We're more popular than Jesus now; I don't know which will go first - rock 'n' roll or Christianity.