JAM London – Sharing stories behind great products
electrical brain stimulation to accelerate learning. 5 theories .. continually jam my rifle. .. student Lauren Bullard, who was one of the subjects in another study on TDCS and learning reported at the meeting, along with her. Where Theory and Research Meet to Jam About the Mind celebrated philosophers of mind and a visiting professor at New York University. But a good scientific theory must be more than elegant and beautiful. National Scientific and Technical Research Council in Argentina, met Bak at . along those connections or where (and when) a traffic jam is likely to form.
More about the day Morning Drawing and laying out your work, organising your files work using pages, artboards, symbols, text styles and colour palettes, learning the main keyboard shortcuts to help speed up your workflow.
An introduction to Sketch Library and how to use symbols to build shared design systems. An introduction to Sketch plugins and those recommended to help with commonly performed tasks.
Designing for Behavior Change by Stephen Wendel
Learn how to use the Magic Mirror and Auto Layout plugins to quickly create designs for a range of screen sizes. Use the Sketch Mirror and Cloud feature to preview your designs on your phone and share them with others.
Afternoon This will be the hands-on part of the day. You will be tasked to use your new found knowledge to replicate an existing mobile app UI. Copying an existing design will allow you to shift your thinking from a conceptual mindset to that of how to use the available tools to get the job done.
However, Chalmers disagrees with Kripke, and all the direct reference theorists in general.
David Chalmers - Wikipedia
He thinks that there are two kinds of intension of a natural kind term, a stance which is now called two dimensionalism. For example, the words, "Water is H2O" are taken to express two distinct propositions, often referred to as a primary intension and a secondary intension, which together compose its meaning.
The primary intension of "water" might be a description, such as watery stuff. The thing picked out by the primary intension of "water" could have been otherwise. For example, on some other world where the inhabitants take "water" to mean watery stuff, but where the chemical make-up of watery stuff is not H2O, it is not the case that water is H2O for that world. The secondary intension of "water" is whatever thing "water" happens to pick out in this world, whatever that world happens to be.
- Sand Pile Model of the Mind Grows in Popularity
- David Chalmers
- Sharing the stories behind great products
So if we assign "water" the primary intension watery stuff then the secondary intension of "water" is H2O, since H2O is watery stuff in this world. The secondary intension of "water" in our world is H2O, and is H2O in every world because unlike watery stuff it is impossible for H2O to be other than H2O. When considered according to its secondary intension, water means H2O in every world.
Philosophy of verbal disputes[ edit ] In some more recent work, Chalmers has concentrated on verbal disputes. In the same work, Chalmers proposes certain procedures for the resolution of verbal disputes. One of these he calls the "elimination method", which involves eliminating the contentious term and observing whether any dispute remains. Personal life[ edit ] Chalmers is the lead singer of the Zombie Blues band, which performed at the music festival Qualia Fest in in New York.
1. How the Mind Decides What to Do Next - Designing for Behavior Change [Book]
Inthe Danish physicist Per Bak proclaimed to a group of neuroscientists that it had taken him only 10 minutes to determine where the field had gone wrong. Perhaps the brain was less complicated than they thought, he said. Add the ongoing efforts to found a journal devoted to such studies, and you have all the hallmarks of a field moving from the fringes of disciplinary boundaries to the mainstream.
In the s, Bak first wondered how the exquisite order seen in nature arises out of the disordered mix of particles that constitute the building blocks of matter.
He found an answer in phase transition, the process by which a material transforms from one phase of matter to another. The change can be sudden, like water evaporating into steam, or gradual, like a material becoming superconductive.
But Bak proposed a means by which simple, local interactions between the elements of a system could spontaneously reach that critical point — hence the term self-organized criticality. Think of sand running from the top of an hourglass to the bottom.
Grain by grain, the sand accumulates. Eventually, the growing pile reaches a point where it is so unstable that the next grain to fall may cause it to collapse in an avalanche.
When a collapse occurs, the base widens, and the sand starts to pile up again — until the mound once again hits the critical point and founders. It is through this series of avalanches of various sizes that the sand pile — a complex system of millions of tiny elements — maintains overall stability.
While these small instabilities paradoxically keep the sand pile stable, once the pile reaches the critical point, there is no way to tell whether the next grain to drop will cause an avalanche — or just how big any given avalanche will be. All one can say for sure is that smaller avalanches will occur more frequently than larger ones, following what is known as a power law.
Bak began to see the stabilizing role of frequent smaller collapses wherever he looked. The brain is an incredibly complex machine.
A better understanding of these critical dynamics could shed light on what happens when the brain malfunctions.