Differentiate the relationship between stratification and ideology

Consider This: The Important Distinctions between Stratification and Inequality

Explain the relationship between social inequality, social stratification and ideology. Social context = the material and ideological conditions of society (Some refer to this Social networks, social ties, association, union and club memberships It is important to differentiate between social differentiation, social inequality, and. Consider This: The Important Distinctions between Stratification and Inequality ordering of social arrangements across socially differentiated groups. They are encompassed within ideologies, such as racism, sexism.

They are encompassed within ideologies, such as racism, sexism, ageism, ableism, and heterosexism, that endure precisely because they benefit certain groups. My current research examines wealth inequality across groups and over time. Wealth in Canada is highly concentrated, much more than income. Even though little has changed over the past fifteen years in terms of this broader distribution, the average net worth for the wealthiest households has increased substantially, but groups closer to the bottom of the distribution have seen few gains in their average wealth levels.

Wealth inequality across groups, especially among those with different levels of education, is also growing. These trends are tied to labor market standing, as well as policy choices and institutional practices at the national and provincial levels.

  • Differentiating Between Stratification & Ideology

This occurs in part because certain structures support the concentration of wealth in Canada. Our wealth building programs like RRSPs, TFSAs, and mortgage deductions tend to benefit middle- and upper-class families with extra money to put aside, while other policies that include asset limits as part of means testing for social assistance programs work to further disadvantage low-income families.

As a result, these policies do little to reduce wealth disparities. And, this is just one of many examples for how structures and policies with the goal of helping groups build resources can function in a way that leads in the opposite direction of their stated aims. If we, as a society, want to do something about the ever-present uneven outcomes and the inequalities in opportunities and resources that plague certain groups, we need to address stratification, the structures that maintain it, and the ideologies that justify it.

This means doing more than just donating money and supporting charities. It means actively engaging yourself in policy and politics.

It means focusing on stratification, not just inequality. Her teaching and research interests center on social stratification and extend to areas of gender and family, race and ethnicity, criminology, economic sociology, labor and credit markets, and disability studies. Her recent projects have focused on the causes and consequences of bankruptcy, wealth disparities in the United States and Canada, the effects of incarceration on wealth, and labor market outcomes for people with different types of disabilities.

These projects bring together her broader interests in processes of economic insecurity and cumulative disadvantage, both of which flow across areas and through households. References Banting, Keith, and John Myles.

Relationship Between Ideology and Social Inequality

Inequality and the Fading of Redistributive Politics. Fortin, Nicole, David A. Recent Developments and Policy Options. Grabb, Edward, Jeffrey G. Reitz, and Monica Hwang. Social Inequality in Canada: Dimensions of Disadvantage, 6th Ed.

Perception Versus Reality Ideology is a set of beliefs or values of an individual or group on how to best establish laws and govern society. It is based on values, experiences and personal perceptions. Stratification is the real way in which society is divided into classes, such as wealthy, middle class and poor. The dominant political ideology or perspective on the needs of a society typically influences the severity of delineation between groups within each social class.

Social Stratification and ideology have political and social factors. However, stratification is more of a social construct while ideology is typically viewed as a political concept.

Relationship Between Ideology and Social Inequality

Virtually all societies have some division of people into social classes. These divisions are usually driven by income levels, though some cultures have long-held divisions based on history and family lineage.

In the United States, the two dominant political ideologies shape the Republican and Democratic political parties. Consequence Typically, the dominant political or social ideology during a given time frame controls much of the direction societal divisions take for a period of time. From a political standpoint, a Republican president or Congress often take stances that protect the rights to grow wealth and operate a profitable business, which is often viewed as perpetuating stratification levels.

Democratic leadership tends to support an ideology that favors building up the lower income classes with policies aimed at reducing the level of stratification.