Performance Coaching and Feedback
relationship between the managerial coaching and employee performance. This paper is focused on the use of coaching by managers in order to help their. the relation of coaching to the performance management process as made familiar interaction between the interviewer and the interviewee, in addition to the. I teach a class on managing employee performance and coaching A strong relationship between manager and employee is necessary when.
The emphasis is not on proving who is right or wrong, but on gathering information in a non-judgmental manner. Coaching for Success - Taking employees from compliance to commitment can be difficult. Sometimes this is best achieved through the use of open-ended questions leading to the employee's self discovery. Creating a Plan of Action - For the purpose of buy-in and commitment, the supervisor and the employee should jointly create an action plan. The plan should include performance goals that are simple, measurable and attainable.
Feedback Feedback is the primary tool used to provide employees with information and guidance. Feedback consists of two-way communication. Employee feedback provides managers with clues regarding how they are hindering or aiding their subordinates' work performance.
Supervisory feedback should inform, enlighten, and suggest improvements to employees regarding their performance.
Supervisors should describe specific results they have observed as close to the event as possible so ideas stay fresh and any needed adjustments can be made in a timely manner.Coaching and performance management
Successful supervisors develop a routine that includes frequent, in-depth discussions about performance with employees. The routine should remain informal and the discussions should focus on how both the employee and supervisor view the employee's performance and development. Lee, as they relate to performance management: Share - When managers share enough accurate information with employees about the quality and quantity of their work, employees are more likely to fully understand what is needed to continue good performance, correct poor performance or improve mediocre performance.
Seek - Supervisors who actively solicit feedback from their subordinates discover obstacles to their success and are able to remove them in a timely fashion. Continue - Periodic feedback sessions give the manager and employee multiple opportunities to calibrate and recalibrate their joint efforts.
Such organizations have managed to re-shape their cultures to ones based on coaching; where everyone in a leadership role is trained on how to coach. In this way, leaders give their employees constant performance feedback, which in turn, engages employees and creates a desire to continuously improve.
And because it is on-going, it eliminates the need for formal annual appraisals and reviews. One such company is Atlassian, an Australian software development company.
On the basis of their concerns with their traditional approach to performance appraisal and managing performance and their inability to find viable alternatives out there, they made innovative changes that have worked well. To begin, they analyzed their traditional performance review model in detail. They asked what made people perform better and what parts of the reviews worked well.
As a result, they replaced the traditional performance review structure with a more lightweight, continuous model. They incorporated the constructive aspects of reviews in the existing one-on-one meetings but used their regular weekly one-on-one meetings with team members as an opportunity for feedback and coaching. Now, every month, one of these meetings is dedicated to a discussion on how the person can enhance their own performance and play to their strengths.
In so doing, they removed the unconstructive focus on ratings and distribution curves. Actually, it is quite the opposite. Managing poor employee performance is extremely time consuming.
BE IN THE KNOW ON
This is because managers have to provide written reviews, spend time with employees to discuss these reviews, monitor progress made based on these reviews and provide corrective feedback as required. With such enhanced and regular communication and interaction, corrective measures are more easily and seamlessly applied and results are visible fairly quickly.
Yet managers cannot achieve their performance goals on their own. They accomplish their goals through their employees. Create value-added products, services and ideas Engage staff in creating new ways of working and new work processes Ensure their customers are satisfied To achieve these goals, managers must be trained to ask staff: What are you working on?
What are the potentials? So the manager can immediately explore, with the employee, ideas on how to overcome these challenges How can I help?
The Difference Between Managing Performance and Coaching
Which is a critical element in coaching These questions ensure that managers fully engage their employees by involving them, informing them and inspiring them. It leads to greater empowerment among staff because it unleashes their creativity. A New Performance Success Process The thing with traditional reviews is that, despite good intentions, these reviews tend to focus mainly on two sections: This limits the value of these sessions.
Therefore, it makes more sense to discuss specific topics as separate conversations; dispensed continuously throughout the year, in bite-sized chunks. The outcome is that the feedback to employees becomes more actionable and motivational and provides an opportunity for managers to mentor and coach for success.
So how do you begin?
Rip apart the traditional performance review Start by analyzing your existing Performance Management System and identifying what is working and what is not.