He was the friend Aarushi spoke to most
Rajesh and his wife Nupur Talwar are standing trial for the murder of their then year-old daughter Aarushi and domestic help Hemraj in the. In the double murder case of year-old Aarushi Talwar and Hemraj, a theory going on that Aarushi Talwar and the domestic help Hemraj were the sexual relationship between Aarushi and Hemraj was the main reason. Home / Aarushi Hemraj relationship challenging a CBI court order convicting them for the murder of their daughter Aarushi and domestic help Hemraj in
They were not lengthy conversations like crying and cribbing over some issue. It is the system today. May be for the conservative society that still thinks talking between boys and girls is a crimeyes this would sound absurd. It is being pleading to go for a movie with friends for which Rajesh refused.
Aarushi,Hemraj had no physical relationship | Cities News, The Indian Express
Just like any other parent would do usually. Even we warn our teen daughter not to post pics on facebook, does that mean that she will be technically angry on us to create a forever rift?
Give me a break!
Such a cheap statements from Noida police because of the ongoing honour killings in Haryana, Punjab and many other states. She defiantly had better friends and options if she wanted to. She was the most beautiful child, well behaved and parents wanted to give her the world.
Aarushi,Hemraj had no physical relationship
Either they should have been mentally retarted to do such a barbaric act and Talwars definitely are not. Another theory that burnt with the time.
Anitha and Rajesh shared the same premises to work and that is very common in doctor community to share clinics and hospitals to see their patients at different timings. Nupur and Rajesh loved each other and got married. Anitha was close to Nupur and their children were best friends and classmates. So the intimacy is at the level of family friendship and may not be on an extra marital affair. Even if that is the case, I am sure, Rajesh would have known to conceal it from Aarushi and she would not have been affected by it.
2008 Noida double murder case
Aarushi would have gone to Nupur to support if she found something fishy about her dad than to Hemraj. If he was afraid of Talwars, he would have taken the next train and run to his son in law or his family back in Nepal and not wait for them to come and kill him one night?
So there is something else that he was afraid of and no one knows what it is?
That would have infact raged a educated and responsible mother like Nupur and would have only helped her stance of innocence stronger. This country witnessed millions of cases where there were so many eye witnesses and other forensic evidence but people escaping punishment just because they are capable of that. They ordered him to accompany him to the police station.
His father was at the golf course. His mother argued that as a minor, he could not be taken away without a parent. But the boy was bundled into a jeep. And just my mom trying to stop them. I got a little scared and thought it's best to comply, so I got in the car. They made inquiries about my relationship with Aarushi.
But otherwise they were fine with me, they gave me food and time to rest in between questioning. He was taken to meet a senior cop - he does not want to say who or where - and was urged not to reveal "the episode. He was interrogated again, but this time, the law was followed. His parents were present as he answered how well he had known Aarushi, whether she had discussed her relationship with her parents.
Through the grim prism of how it had ended, he relived the month that they had spent getting to know each other. At Delhi University, he says, many students know of his association with Aarushi. Many are not shy of asking him what really happened. He says his answer is always the same. And I don't want to guess either. SP Mahesh Mishra testified that he had asked the terrace door to be opened on 16 May. However, his subordinates told him that Rajesh Talwar couldn't find the key and they couldn't find a mechanic to break open the door.
Several visitors continued to arrive at the Talwars' house which was being managed by Dinesh Talwar with their condolences. These visitors included retired police officer K. Gautam, who had been requested by Sushil Chaudhury to come to the Talwars' house. After arriving at the house, Gautam examined the rooms of Aarushi and Hemraj. Dinesh then showed him the blood stains on the terrace door handle. According to Gautam, Dinesh requested him to get the terrace door lock opened.
Gautam then called SP Mahesh Mishra, and told him that the lock needed to be broken. Mishra promised that he would himself visit the crime scene, and meanwhile, sent the station officer Dataram Nauneria to the apartment. The key to the terrace was still missing. Anita Durrani asked the Talwars' neighbour Puneesh Tandon if he had a duplicate key to the Talwars' terrace, to which Tandon replied in the negative.
A body "in advanced stage of putrefaction " was discovered lying in a pool of blood at about Meanwhile, SP Mahesh Mishra also reached the spot. Rajesh went upstairs to identify the body. He told the police that he couldn't be sure that the body was that of Hemraj, due to the injuries and the decomposition. Later, a friend of Hemraj identified the body as his.
At Haridwar, Rajesh entered the time of Aarushi's death as 2 am in the priest's records. Then, their throats were slit with a sharp weapon.
There was no sign of asphyxia. The CBI closure report also mentions an injury on the occipital bonebut according to the Talwars' lawyers, the only injury mentioned by the post-mortem report is one on the left parietal bone.
Hemraj had identical cuts on the neck at the same position. The first hit on the forehead resulted in her death within two minutes, as indicated by the blood clot size.Aarushi case: 'Hemraj knew of threat to life'
The defence argued that the CBI officers had drawn the words "golf club" from Dohre's mouth. RK Sharma, who told the court that this fracture could not have been caused by a golf club.
The identical measurements of the lacerated wounds indicated that the same weapon was used on both the victims.
In Maythe forensic scientists remarked that the wounds displayed a "clinical precision and careful thought", as they were inflicted at the right spot to cut the windpipe and dissect the vital left common carotid artery which supplies oxygenated blood to the brain.
By Junethe CBI's suspicion had shifted to the three Nepali men, and the weapon was believed to be a kukria type of Nepali knife. InCBI told the court that according to the faculty at the Talwars' alma mater Maulana Azad Medical Collegetheir dental students were taught surgery. The defence argued that a dentist's scalpel has a cutting surface of about a centimeter: RK Sharma, the wounds could have been caused by surgical scalpel No.
Her face was covered with her schoolbag.
Aarushi-Hemraj murder case: Intercourse theory takes a knock | Delhi News - Times of India
However, there was no blood on the toys, the schoolbag and the pink pillow kept on the back of the bed. These items were within the range of the splashed blood area, which indicates that they were placed on the bed after the murder. Aarushi's body lay undisturbed on the bed, and the bed sheet was laid out smoothly. Sunil Dohre marked Aarushi's genital area as "nothing abnormal detected", thus ruling out a sexual assault, but also noted the presence of a "whitish discharge" at her vagina.
The whitish discharge sample was sent for pathological examination at the local district hospital, which reported absence of semen. However, later, inwhen this vaginal swab sample was sent to CBI's forensic labs, it was suspected to have been tampered with see below. Ultimately, the CBI concluded that the sample had got contaminated, but not deliberately tampered with. Urmila Sharma testified that the whitish discharge is normal in and year-old girls after the beginning of a menstrual cycle.
There was no such wet patch on her pyjamaswhich were untied; no urine or any other bodily fluid was found on her underwear either. The lower garments of Aarushi appeared to have been pulled up or pulled down, as her buttock cleavage was visible.
CBI suspected that her pelvic area was swabbed clean, and the pyjamas were pulled up afterwards. Dohre stated that Aarushi's private parts were "extraordinarily dilated", although there were no signs of rape. He also stated that her vaginal orifice was "unduly large", the mouth of her cervix was visible and the whitish discharge was confined to the vagina, when it should have spread to the "entire area".
Dohre stated that he had not mentioned these observations in his original report, because these were his "subjective findings", and because "the findings were non-specific and were very strange". He thus concluded that Aarushi's private parts appeared to have been cleaned after she died.
The body was dragged towards to AC unit, as the quantity of blood was more near the AC unit.
An expert from FSL Gandhinagar as well as a team of experts from CFSL concluded that the drag mark on the roof resulted from a blood-soaked body being dragged after being kept in a bed sheet.
So, unless the killer cleaned up the original murder spot, Hemraj seems to have been killed on the terrace. The blood found on the staircase leading to the terrace on 17 May might have come from the mattress that the cleaners were trying to dump on the terrace. The investigators found a smudged blood-stained palm print on the terrace wall. The blood was later identified as that of Hemraj, but the print could not be identified.