Bush's sordid Saudi ties set template for Trump – he was just more subtle | US news | The Guardian
It also connects the dots in respect too the Saudi's involvment in 9/11 and show how the relationship between the Bushes and Saudi Arabia influenced. Dec 7, The U.S.-Saudi Arabia alliance is built on decades of security . The George W. Bush administration's omission of twenty-eight pages from the. Dec 4, The reality, writes the author of House of Bush, House of Saud, was much “In any case, our relationship is with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Relieved to be in the hands of Saudis, he instructed the interrogators to call the prince. And sincewhen al-Qaeda carried out an attack in Saudi Arabia, the country has reportedly been less obstructionist and more willing to partner with the United States in stopping individual terrorists. Yet the Bush administration has never faced the same level of scrutiny or hysteria for its ties to the Saudis as Trump and his inner circle are now undergoing for their Russian connections.
But while Bush and his family stand out for the extent and sheer brazenness of their Saudi connections, fealty to Saudi Arabia has always been a bipartisan affair.
Congress overrode his veto. Clinton seemed to have forgotten about Saudi Arabia, whose nationals carried out a very real attack on the United States and, far from suffering no consequences, had been rewarded. At the same time, Tony Podesta, brother of Clinton campaign manager and confidante John Podesta, was working as a lobbyist for the Saudis. Meanwhile, the Clinton-aligned Center for American Progress and Clinton ally Mike Morell urged a renewed commitment to supporting Saudi Arabia a few weeks before the election.
No wonder the Saudis were looking forward to her presidency. The royal family has hired at least fifteen firms to date, with at least six signing on since the inauguration. Many of these firms have connect ions to members of both the Democratic and Republican establishments.
Decades of Access Ultimately, the Saudi government has been allowed to get away with these things because of its vast oil reserves. But for decades, the Saudis have also consciously attempted to curry favor with US officials, Democrat and Republican.
Ordinarily, this level of long-term influence-courting from another country might inspire suspicion or scrutiny, particularly when the country in question has been facilitating anti-American interests for just as long. Some of them have even ended up working for the Saudi government.
The disparity between how Saudi Arabia and Russia appear in the public consciousness is perhaps best illustrated by Donald Trump.
Perhaps this will all turn out to be true. On the campaign trail, Trump was a strident anti-Saudi critic.
Bush's Saudi Connections
What about before the attacks? He later helped the pair — who spoke almost no English — find a flight school. Al-Bayoumi insisted the restaurant meeting was a chance encounter, and that he was just helping out fellow Muslims. But he was also in regular contact with Fahad al-Thumairy, a Saudi consulate official who was deported in for suspected terrorist links, and with Anwar al-Awlaki, the radical, American-born Islamic preacher who helped inspire several terrorist attacks.
Al-Bayoumi was questioned by the FBI, but released without charge. Is there any other evidence of complicity? Many suspect some of this cash was passed on to the hijackers.Bush comments after meeting with Saudi Crown Prince
Bandar has also been accused by Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker, of being one of al Qaeda's donors in the run-up to the attacks. Congress is considering a bill that would allow U. Foreign governments currently receive immunity from prosecution in the U. Many members of Congress argue that releasing the Joint Congressional Inquiry's findings in full would shed light on whether the Saudis have some specific allegations to answer.
The good news is that the Saudi issue gives them a chance to demonstrate their mettle -- at Bush's expense. The incubatory role played by Saudi Arabia and the Wahhabite sect in fostering Islamic extremism is well documented. The desert kingdom leads the way in financing and inciting Muslim holy warriors the world over.
How much of this is done with the complicity of the Saudi regime is unclear, but what is clear is that the royal family is a kleptocracy that has forestalled its own inevitable demise by redirecting domestic unrest outward. September 11 was a plot hatched by an exiled Saudi dissident, and 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis. In the two years sincethe Saudis have been an obstacle, not an ally, in the battle against Islamic terrorism.
House of Bush, House of Saud - Wikipedia
Sure, they've muzzled a few firebrand clerics and rounded up some lumpen Islamicists. But they've shown little inclination to stanch the flow of money from so-called charity organizations to al-Qaeda and other militant groups, and they've kept cooperation with the FBI and the CIA to a minimum. The royal family's many American mouthpieces assure us that the May 12 suicide bombing in Riyadh was a watershed -- that the Saudis now understand how dangerous al-Qaeda is and will henceforth be tripping over themselves to help us.
That hope is delusional and illogical. The royal family is interested only in self-preservation, and joining the fight against terrorism in any meaningful way would be an act of suicide. John O'Neill, the sadly prescient FBI counterterrorism expert who perished in the World Trade Center attack, understood long before that the problem of "Islamofacism" was chiefly a Saudi one.
Follow the Author
Indeed, he has protected the Saudis at every juncture. The pattern was established within hours of the atrocities in New York and Washington, when Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi ambassador long known as Bandar Bush because of his coziness with the first familywas permitted to spirit members of the bin Laden clan out of the United States before the FBI could properly interview them. Since then, the Department of Justice has impeded the lawsuit filed against the Saudi regime by the September 11 families; the White House blacked out the portions of a congressional report that detailed the Saudi role inand everyone from the president on down has steadfastly insisted that the Saudis are paid-up members of the anti-terrorism posse.
Bush can spew all the frontier rhetoric he wishes, but in the case of the Saudis, his inaction speaks louder. Why he would rather undermine the war on terrorism than confront Riyadh is an interesting question, and it doesn't require a particularly active imagination to wonder if there is more here than just oil and a bad case of realpolitik. The links between the House of Bush and the House of Saud are deep, overlapping and notoriously opaque: The main law firm retained by the Saudis to defend them against the families is Baker Botts -- as in James Baker, the Bush family consigliere.
And, of course, there's oil, the black glue connecting all these dots. In short, the Bushies have profited mightily from a relationship with a foreign government that can be indirectly, perhaps even directly, implicated in the September 11 attacks and other terrorist incidents and that has been the driving force behind a worldwide jihad.