relation | Definition of relation in English by Oxford Dictionaries
Synonyms of relationship - connection, relation, association, link, correlation. relationship. See definition of relationship. intermarriage premium once the selection into different types of marriage is controlled for. .. There is no consensus on the definition of social capital. Durlauf. lated to the time-gap between school departure and first marriage. . system, and thus we can treat university education as meaning 'the same . riages, this approach is susceptible to a potential bias: that heterogamous.
Differential selection, marital quality, and health behaviors partly account for some of the health disparities by marital status and spousal age gap. Prior work has extensively documented the impact of widowhood on psychological well-being, mortality, and physical health, with most finding evidence of adverse effects of widowhood Carr et al.
Yet, emotional and physical responses to widowhood vary widely depending on personal resources, contextual effects, and personality, and there are some subpopulations who are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of widowhood Carr et al. The characteristics of marriage have particularly important implications for the way individuals respond to widowhood Carr et al. There is, however, little work examining whether marital sorting patterns and the resulting sociodemographic dissimilarities between spouses make certain individuals particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of widowhood for health.
Even less is known of the mechanisms engendering the differential vulnerability of individuals in unions with varying degrees of sociodemographic similarities between spouses. This article examines whether individuals in age heterogamous unions i. We focus on the spousal age gap because it has important implications for the family life of older adults.
Specifically, we compare the mental and physical health of widowed and married individuals. We then determine whether widowed persons who were previously in age heterogamous unions are particularly more vulnerable to the adverse consequences of widowhood.
Finally, we investigate the extent to which differential selection, marital quality, and health practices during marriage explain the health disadvantage of widowed persons, especially those in age heterogamous unions. We use the terms age homogamy and age heterogamy extensively throughout the article.
relationship | Definition of relationship in English by Oxford Dictionaries
Age homogamy refers to unions between spouses who are similar in age. Age heterogamy refers to unions with large age differentials between spouses. In this article, we operationalize age heterogamy as marriages where wives are 4 or more years older than husbands and husbands are 12 or more years older than wives.
The consequences of widowhood are, however, more pronounced among men than for women and for younger than older widows. Evidence is, however, inconsistent with respect to the effects of widowhood on physical health. Some find that widowhood has deleterious consequences for physical health and widowed persons have greater occurrences of physical health problems Stroebe et al.
Such research may be corporately funded, but is generally not written for profit by its producers. We can't always and perhaps should never wholly dismiss the value of work we read that contains or is supplied alongside advertising, but we can put some stock, at least, in the reliability of work that does not. I'm not saying here that anything that is published in a journal is guaranteed to be excellent work or absolutely correct; Journal editors have, upon occasion, had to issue retractions that renounce the validity of work they've published.
But those occasions are limited overall, and when scholars find problems with and critique previously published work, we need to see these responses as a feature of academic scholarship rather than a "bug. Debates and conflict may shake your confidence in some of the material you've learned, but that shaking can be useful in helping you remember to weigh information carefully and to acknowledge ambiguity or uncertainty when it's necessary to do so.
Complicating the distinctions we might try to make between purely academic and public writing and journalism is the fact that scholars regularly write in public venues in addition to the work they produce for scholarly journals. We see it, for instance, in their blogs or on news and political sites, and, as with anything else we find online, we must assess the credibility and utility of what we learn there by attending to the background of the writer, the venue for which he or she writes, and, though it's not always easy, the substance of the work.
Also complicating these distinctions is Wikipedia, one of the best sources of information on the web. You will find and may have already found that some teachers and professors discourage its use.
Definition of Heterogamy
I think it's worth acknowledging that there are some valid reasons that these people do not want you to cite it as a source in a college-level writing assignment. Some of them might tell you not to cite it because "anybody can edit it" and do so anonymouslytwo facts which, for them, mean that what's there can not be trusted.
I respect, though do not agree with, this rationale. To my mind, the primary reason not to cite it in your college papers is that it's an encyclopedia, a source that was, historically, too general to be appropriate for use in an academic setting.
Wikipedia is better than the old encyclopedias, however, because it's constantly updated. The frequency of revisions and new entries can't tell us how accurate the content is, of course, nor can it change the fact that those editing or revising are overwhelmingly male.
Meaning of "heterogamy" in the English dictionary
Nonetheless, the site is generally transparent about its methods and practices, and they are, in fact, more rigorous than those that govern the content of many other sites.
For more on Wikipedia's "lessons," take a look at this online book by Harvard's Jonathan L.
Note too that these are relatively old studies and more recent research no doubt exists. I think you should feel free to consult Wikipedia on pretty much everything that interests you.
It is a great place to start your research. I am happy to admit that I read and learn from entries there on a daily basis. Yet I also want to impress upon you that it is not a great place to stop. Although academics are among those who write and edit content for it, Wikipedia is not a scholarly source; it is, therefore, not often going to be a good source to cite in a college essay.
It is also not a site whose content can simply be adapted or reassembled in a paper!