My Nazi grandfather, Amon Goeth, would have shot me - BBC News
The first one-on-one conversation between Schindler and Goeth is a telling one. The use of color at the beginning and end of the film helps frame it as a Examine the relationship between Oskar Schindler and Itzhak Stern. David M. Crowe's book Oskar Schindler: The Untold Account of His Life, In addition, helping Jews became a way to fight against what he viewed as The scene in the movie Schindler's List with Oskar Schindler thinking of. Scene from the movie Schindler's List Schindler was released because of the Jewish support while Goeth – having no Jewish support for.
However, it is doubtful that Goeth was stealing food from the Plaszow camp when there was a jewelry factory there as well as a furniture factory and a custom tailor shop.
My Nazi grandfather, Amon Goeth, would have shot me
Pemper told author David Crowe that: When Goeth realized that he was being investigated by Dr. Morgen, he sought permission from Wilhelm Koppe in the central office in Oranienburg to execute Wilek Chilowicz, who could have testified against him. Based on this report, Koppe sent a secret letter to Goeth giving him the authority to carry out the execution of Chilowicz and several other OD men.
The execution took place on August 13, ; Goeth was arrested exactly a month later and charged by Dr. Morgen with corruption and brutality, including the murder of Wilek Chilowicz and several others. The office in Oranienburg did not have the authority to give an execution order; an execution could only be authorized by the Gestapo in Berlin.
Oskar Schindler had a lot in common with Amon Goeth, including the fact that both were Catholic and both were arrested by the Nazis for engaging in black market activities. Both were out to get rich from the war-time economy in Poland. Schindler was an ethnic German living in what is now the state of Moravia in the Czech Republic. His trial took place between August 27, and September 5, His crime was that he had taken part in the activities of these two criminal organizations.
Goeth was also charged with the following crime: He also stole clothing, furniture and other movable property belonging to displaced or interned people, and sent them to Germany.
There will be no summary executions here. In reality, Schindler's undertaking is now coming at great personal cost. By war's end, Schindler has spent most of his personal wealth on constructing his camp, providing food for his Jewish workers, and bribing Nazi officials.
Once Germany surrenders to the Allied forces, Schindler, who is still a member of the Nazi Party, is forced to flee his factory. Before he leaves, his workers present him with a letter explaining what he has done, signed by every worker at his factory.
They also give him a golden ring with the Talmudic inscription: The following morning, the Jewish workers are met by a Soviet soldier who declares that they have been liberated by the Soviet Army.
In the aftermath of the war, the Israeli government award Schindler the title of one of the Righteous Among the Nations—an honor for non-Jews who risked their lives to save Jews during the Holocaust. He is buried in Jerusalem on Mount Zion. Writing for The New York Review of Books, Jason Epstein argues that this emphasis obscures perhaps the most disturbing lesson to be taken away from the Holocaust: Schindler was an exotic exception and Spielberg's film lets viewers take comfort and pride in his virtuous behavior.
The film has no shortage of Jewish victims who suffer violent abuse and even death—often brought on by such minor "violations" as failure to do one's job properly like the boy who couldn't clean Goeth's tubtaking one's job too seriously like the engineer who pointed out a flaw in a barracks' constructionor simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
The casual manner in which these murders are portrayed is a powerful testament to Nazi officials' indifference toward Jewish lives. Moreover, the faceless and utterly ordinary looking masses of German soldiers and bureaucrats who are carrying out—or otherwise complicit in—these atrocities ought to leave the viewer with perhaps the most haunting question of all: How many of us would really have had the courage to stand up against the system, knowing that we might be risking our lives and those of our families?
A serious reflection on Schindler's List may cause viewers to consider the notion that they themselves might have been cogs in the Nazi machinery. That said, Epstein's concerns about Spielberg's emphasis should not be dismissed entirely. The danger that Schindler's List will be interpreted as a story of triumph and exceptionalism is absolutely real. At the same time, it is hard to imagine a film about the Holocaust reaching an audience of this size without giving the viewer some cause for hope and optimism.
The Value of Human Life Schindler's lament over all the money he wasted is one of the movie's most memorable scenes.
Looking at his car, he declares that 10 more people could have been saved if he had been willing to give it up. If he had sold his golden Nazi Party lapel pin, he is convinced he could have rescued at least one more. While the price of saving a life may have felt more salient to Schindler as he looked into the eyes of the people he'd rescued, most citizens of developed countries find themselves in a similar situation every day. The cost of a single meal at an affordable New York restaurant could easily provide food for an undernourished child in Sudan for a month.
The answer to the question of whether we're doing enough is never black and white. But when confronted with the dollar value of saving or significantly improving a life, it's hard to argue that we're really doing all we can.
In this sense, Schindler's realization that he could have done more may be the movie's most universal moral reflection.
Ethics on Film: Discussion of "Schindler's List"
Can one responsibly create a work of historical fiction about the Holocaust? If so, what considerations does one have to make? If not, why not? Do you see Oskar Schindler's narrative as a success story, or a story of failure?
K. Graf, "Oskar Schindler, The Man and the Myth" ()
Schindler's original plan was simply to make money off the war. Are the people who profit from wars morally responsible for them, or are they simply businesspeople? Throughout the movie, we meet Jewish prisoners acting as enforcers for the Nazis in the ghetto. Why do you think Spielberg chose to emphasize these characters? In his portrayal of the liquidation of the ghetto, Spielberg juxtaposes footage of the massacre with footage of an SS officer playing Mozart on a piano in one of the apartment buildings.
What do you think Spielberg is trying to convey by doing this? In a conversation with Amon Goeth, Schindler tells the SS officer that it is not the ability to exercise violence that makes somebody exceptional, but rather the ability to pardon the "worthless" for no apparent reason.
One interpretation of this scene is that Schindler is attempting to convince Goeth to treat his prisoners better, but is it possible that Schindler is really explaining his own motivations?
Immediately before fleeing his factory after Germany's surrender, Schindler laments all the additional lives he could have saved. Do you experience this kind of tension between spending money on yourself and spending it on others whose lives may depend on it? Did these people have a responsibility to act? Why do you think Schindler agreed to help Stern rescue his workers from the Holocaust?
Do his motivations matter? Ethics Matter, September